About this blog
A.R.T is the International Air Rail Organisation's blog, with news, articles and comment on all things related to air rail links world-wide. Your comments and thoughts are welcome: for obvious reasons, they will be moderated and may be edited.
Search
Categories
Recent Articles
Have you missed one?...
- Mobility Service...
- Bombardier and the...
- Don't Walk!
- Why fly Boston -...
- Oodles?
- What's a light rail line...
- Cold straphanging
- Buy America? Bye bye...
- How valid is the 3 hour...
- There's no-one quite...
- More anomalous security...
- Is this really adding to...
- Washington Dulles...
- Air rail competition in...
Archives
- March 2010 (4)
- February 2010 (12)
- January 2010 (16)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (7)
- October 2009 (16)
- September 2009 (16)
- August 2009 (11)
- July 2009 (29)
- June 2009 (1)
- more...
Friends of A.R.T
Syndicate this blog
- RSS 0.92 (Userland):
Posts, Comments - RSS 1.0 (RDF):
Posts, Comments - RSS 2.0 (Userland):
Posts, Comments - Atom 0.3:
Posts, Comments
Other Links
Jan06
Learning from failed congestion charging proposals
A number of road pricing and congestion charging proposals in the UK have been resoundingly rejected by the public.
One reason is that bodies - especially local government - promoting the concept are supposed to remain neutral. This makes debate with opponents who make false claims and misrepresentations difficult to handle - the promoter is then seen as an advocate and not a neutral.
People with vested interests can easily hijack the proposals, misrepresent issues like the level of charges and privacy, and cause the proposal to be rejected. So - among other things - people likely to benefit from the scheme can be led to believe that they will end up paying significant amounts for something for which they've already paid.
Planning for road pricing? Beware!
Comments & Pingbacks:
No Comments/Pingbacks for this post yet...
Comments are closed for this post.




